7. In cities, space for housing should be created by knocking down historic buildings. What is your opinion?

In today's world of globalisation, the issue regarding demolishing the historical

buildings

for constructing houses in a city has become a major cause of concern in our society. According to my perspective, I believe that destroying historical places for the

house

space

is not a good idea, In

this

essay, I will explain my attribute with strong examples and give a manifold justification.

Firstly

, I want to convey that the historical

buildings

are the pride of our state. Historical

buildings

act as a benchmark of the country all over the globe. Whereas, a

house

can be built anywhere in the city as there is more

space

in other areas too. Historical

buildings

are the symbol of our ancient rulers and they are the proof for our coming youngster to show practically rather than narrating them in words.

For example

, the young generation feels proud by mentioning their historic

place

of their country.

Moreover

, they know how our culture is and

also

how

initially

our ancestors lead their life in those

buildings

without advanced technology.

On the other hand

, I want to argue that it is not compulsory to build the

house

particularly in the

place

of historic

buildings

where they stand. People

also

have other area options where they can envisage empty land for constructing

buildings

.

Thus

, no historical property should be damage for building simple houses. If these

buildings

destructed we cannot build them again everything goes worse. So, love and respect the old historical

buildings

and their infrastructure. In conclusion, I opine that historical building must be visible for our generation to see live and understand the ancient culture and their livelihood of those kings who ruled in it.

Therefore

, building

house

space

can be selected in another

place

in the country. It's better not to target the historical

place

for just

space

.