It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?

For some determinists, it is natural to draw the conclusion that we

humans

should not interfere in those species that are doomed.

Although

this

opinion manifests the respect for natural laws, I disagree with it for the indifference displayed to

humans

' future. Before setting forth arguments against these determinists, I hope to discuss the reasonable elements in their perspectives, namely the reverence for the order of

nature

. After being shocked by sporadic climate disasters,

such

as the poisonous mist in London, and the lethal pollution in the Seine, people have come to realize the consequences of excessively exploiting

nature

and some of them have

subsequently

maintained that we should step out of the field of the

nature

and be an observer.

This

is the historical origin of the determinism in the issue of

extinction

.

Although

the determinism concerned with

extinction

is built on the reflection on our past mistakes, it has gone too far to possess an appropriate concern for our common future. It has long been a consensus that the existence of

humans

largely depends on biodiversity, which, unfortunately, has been under the threat of species disappearance. To illustrate, the inhabitants living in Nauru have suffered from the rapid diminution in the kinds of fish.

This

brutal fact

along with

many others has reminded us of the importance of preventing the

extinction

of species. To summarize, on one hand, the determinists in the issue of

extinction

are reasonable in submitting to

nature

;

on the other hand

,

this

kind of respect should not obstruct us from reducing extinctions in order to make

humans

prosper.