Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement ?

There are various ways for citizens to travel these days

such

as cars and trains. It was thought by some people that governments should endorse

a

Correct article usage

the

show examples

development of railways more than

roads

or streets. In my opinion, I disagree with

this

statement due to the two following reasons.

First

, all public transportation should be developed equally for citizens. In each country, every type of commuting ways is

all

Correct quantifier usage

apply

show examples

used. So, citizens expect to have satisfaction for all types they used. It is better if governments interest in both railways and

roads

.

For example

, imagine you have to travel by train and

then

bus to go to work, you have smooth commuting during sitting in the train but

then

, you ride the bus and are unhappy because of the road surface and environment.

Therefore

, they should be improved in the same manner.

Second

, some country has very bad road systems and their quality. If administrators focus only

trains

Change preposition

on trains

show examples

, they will be worse

mroe

Correct your spelling

more

and more in the future.

Thus

, it may be not right if the statement is globally used.

For instance

, in my country, Thailand, the

roads

, streets, and valleys are very crowded and they had bad quality. So, if

Thai

Correct article usage

the Thai

show examples

government does not solve the problems and interests only trains, the issues will

last

forever.

Consequently

, a development for

roads

cannot be neglected. To conclude, I personally disagree with the statement because money should be spent on both railways and

roads

equally.

This

will make them improved in the same way in the future.