Some believe that governments should financially support creative
. Others think that these
should be given financial support from alternative sources. I support the latter idea as the governments have more important issues to solve.
On the one hand, the positive influence of famous painters and musicians on people is undeniable. They inspire and motivate millions of people around the world by their work and performance.
is why many think that they deserve more money apart from fame and respect.
, the path of an artist is unpredictable and, in my opinion, a person choosing
path should be ready for any circumstances including the lack of money.
, some popular
at the early stages of their career had two jobs to cover basic needs.
On the other hand
, there are investors and wealthy fans of art that can be a good source of income for many creative
, with the help of the internet, finding the necessary number of supporters can be easier than ever before. From my perspective, social media
as Instagram, Telescope, YouTube and others can potentially bring more money than any government.
, there is a number of rising musicians that earned more than a million dollars in one year with the help of a platform called Apple Music.
In conclusion, while some people think that financial aid should be given to creative
by the governments, I believe that they should be financed by alternative sources. I would recommend focusing on the creation of wide auditory on social platforms.