Some people think that public art should be funded by governments, while others believe that it should be funded by other sources. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

People have different opinions about how to provide funding to public

arts

. Some say it's the government's responsibility to give funds to back the development of public

arts

, while other people think it is better if the project is supported by other resources.

Governments

can balance the funding dedicated to various patterns of public

arts

and can

therefore

benefit their overall advancement. In fact, there are several subcategories of public

arts

such

as sculptures, paintings, etc. Funding public

arts

by

governments

helps to make sure that an appropriate amount of money is spent on each type of

art

.

Otherwise

, it is very possible that certain

art

is overfunded while another is underfunded, which will definitely cause unfairness and inequality.

On the other hand

, efforts will not be spared in organizations that are dedicated to supporting one or several types of public

arts

. That means it is more efficient to raise money and larger investments can be used to support the development. Actually, there are companies and organizations aiming at giving support to the improvement of various types of

arts

. They hold multiple campaigns every year so as to collect money. These funds can

thus

be spent on various factors that can help the specific

art

to grow,

such

as support projects or programs proposed by artists and launch new works in different public locations. In conclusion, public

arts

can be funded by both

governments

and other sources. As far as I am concerned,

governments

can provide funds to ensure the basic development of each type of

art

, and we should

also

welcome the investment from other resources if they aim at deepening the understanding and developing a specific

art

.