Many people believe that a person’s culture is defined by their country of origin, while others believe that it has only minor influence. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

It is considered by many that, individual’s homeland plays an essential

role

in developing their

culture

,

on the contrary

, many argue that

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

the birth

country

has minimal impact on

this

. In my opinion, I believe that home

country

and surroundings have a vital impact in defining pupil’s

culture

. It is commonly believed that social principles start to develop based on the birthplace and society they live in. Observing power of humans are exceptional, a newborn start analyzing and add the same to memory, how people react or approach a case, and the same will be applied in his turn, because of

this

, each individual’s, friends, relatives and neighbours play a critical

role

in it.

Additionally

, during the early school days, students were taught about moral

values

based on curriculum and it varies from

country

to

country

.

For instance

, the child of an Indian immigrant family in Europe will most likely follow Hinduistic worship ways rather than Christian. On the other side, it is argued by many that, the home countrys'

role

in people's

culture

is negligible. As per their point of view, humans’ adaptability is supremely high, because of

this

everyone’s cultural

values

may change based on the circumstances. To illustrate, students who moved overseas for higher education quickly adopt the

values

of the foreign

country

or people forced themselves to change based on the organization they work for. In conclusion, different peoples have different opinions about the birth countries’ involvement in building individual’s cultural

values

. In my point of view, the native place has a vital

role

in defining everyone’s

culture

.