Introduction
The question of replacing old houses with new ones is highly topical nowadays. It is considered by the great part of the society that everything should be renovated and refreshed including edifices. Their opponents claim that old
constructions
can possess crucial value for the culture, on the one hand, and are still occupied by people living in them. I prefer to agree with the latter point.Use synonyms
Body paragraph 1
It's not a secret that
constructions
tend to be crashed and dilapidated over time. They change their shape becoming unsuitable for living and Use synonyms
that is
the Linking Words
first
reason why they should be replaced with time. Linking Words
For example
, if the roof of the construction is erased because of enduring action of sun or moisture Linking Words
this
building cannot be exploited with the purpose of living.The Linking Words
next
reason is the aesthetician one. Some buildings can be so ugly and unattractive that they just cannot answer new demands and tastes. Examples of those are soviet standard panel or brick residential 5-floors buildings, which are called "Linking Words
khrushchevki
", which were built with thoughts of everything but aesthetic.Correct your spelling
Khrushchev
Body paragraph 2
However
, not all edifices deserve reconstruction or demolition. Some of them might be either of cultural significance or of a historical one. As an example, we can take printing yard on Nikolskaya Street in Moscow. It's a house that was constructed in the 19th century and Linking Words
this
fact can be noticed if we look at the backside of the construction. It looks extremely decrepit and rundown in the background but Linking Words
this
dilapidation has its own charm and emphasizes how ancient the building is. So, in my opinion, it should not be reconstructed or even restored. Linking Words
Furthermore
, there might be not only historical or cultural reasons but humanistic ones. Linking Words
For instance
, the building can be inhabited by families living there for years and refusing to leave their places. Of course, their desires should be taken into account as well. In many cases, it seems more rational to allow these people to stay in old Linking Words
edificies
rather than organize their resettlement for financial reasons or for others.Correct your spelling
edifices
edifice
Conclusion
To conclude, the answer to the question about managing the destinies of old
constructions
cannot be concrete and explicit. The decision to maintain old houses or to replace them with new ones should be based on common sense. Use synonyms
However
, I strongly believe that if there is an opportunity to preserve ancient Linking Words
constructions
it should be done to save cultural heritage.Use synonyms