Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
It is true that society pays too much attention and
allocate
too many resources to protect wild Correct subject-verb agreement
allocates
animals
. In my opinion, I totally agree with this
point of view.
There are some reasons why I think that the protection of wild species
has attracted great public attention. Firstly
, many non-governmental organizations are established to protect animals
over the world. However
, they are too concerned about animal-related problems. For example
, these institutions accused famous singers of using wildlife animals
in their music videos for commercial purposes, while
they did not. Secondly
, news about animal-related problems can be spread widely on the Internet. For instance
, if a polar bear is imprisoned someplace, this
news will be shared rapidly through social networking sites such
as Facebook, Telegram, and Twitter.
In addition
, people spend too much money on protecting animal species
. The most important thing is that a great deal of money is required to carry out projects aiming to save the DNA of animals
, which infrastructure and research are most
expensive. Correct article usage
the most
Moreover
, authorities have created many national parks and natural reserves, where rare species
have the freedom to roam, exhibit their behaviours, and breed. Thus
, this
contributes to saving wildlife from extinction. Another thing is that governments should increase investment in key fields such
as medicine, agriculture, and education. Additionally
, they can allocate resources to improve the quality of life in some areas in the next years.
In conclusion, I think that the public has spent too much concern and money protecting animal species
in this
modern world.Submitted by nhatrangthanyeu2013 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
The response demonstrates some organization and coherence, but it lacks consistency in the development of ideas. Topic development is somewhat unclear due to poor examples and irrelevant content. The introduction outlines the writer's opinion but lacks a clear statement of the main ideas that will be discussed in the body of the essay. The conclusion is brief and does not effectively summarize the main points.
task achievement
The writer has given an opinion but has not provided a clear position on the topic. There are some relevant points raised, but they are not well developed. The examples used are not entirely relevant to the point of view. Some ideas are not fully supported, and the response lacks depth in the treatment of the topic.