Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

People have different views about whether or not the
government
should invest in the dimension of arts. Some critics do not agree with
this
kind of sponsorship;
however
, others believe arts should be the responsibility of the
government
. In
this
essay, I will discuss both views and give my own opinion.
Art
is one of the essential parts of our society. I am strongly convinced that the
government
should make an effort to assist in
art
development. The reason is that
art
consists of wide concepts,
such
as cultural heritage, the exhibition of
artists
’ work, painting, architecture and symphonies as well.
Moreover
, the inspiration of
artists
might come from the place where they are living
in
Change preposition
apply
show examples
, or the atmosphere and circumstance they are exposed to. These are the attractions that evoke visitors’ desire to travel a country because
art
reflects the culture, societies and people’s
mind
Fix the agreement mistake
minds
show examples
in any era. Once the
government
continuously finances
artists
and gives
a
Correct pronoun usage
them a
show examples
platform and resource to express their artwork, it might enable
artists
to stimulate creativity effectively.
Consequently
,
art
does not only enrich people’s spiritual life, but
also
vitalise the growth of the local tourism industry, and
further
expand the nation’s economy.
Nevertheless
, the subsidies of
art
are contributed from citizens’ taxes. These taxpayers argue that
art
should be sponsored by private donations because there are only a small proportion of people who indulge in artworks, particularly in the high society's elite. I’m addition,
for
Change preposition
apply
show examples
those who do not pay attention to arts feel that funding
art
is a wasteful and extravagant action. It is more acceptable for them to allow the
government
to allocate subsidies on other aspects
such
as education, security, health and low-income families.
As a result
, the restriction of allowance would lead to a negative impact on
artists
because they know their
production
Replace the word
products
show examples
will not be supported and they might abandon their pursuit in
art
and
thus
, stifle their imagination and creativity. In conclusion, admittedly, it is really unfair and unworthy for people who do not emphasize and admire
art
.
This
is because they wanted to achieve instant benefits.
However
, in the long run, our society will gain more advantages through
art
, and continuously progressing and colouring citizens' life.
Submitted by yutingsong086 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • enriching society
  • promoting cultural understanding
  • development of talent
  • creative industries
  • economic benefits
  • generate revenue
  • cultural heritage
  • identity
  • prioritize spending
  • needs of the majority
What to do next:
Look at other essays: