Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while others argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

People have different views about the use of

animals

in research, some of them support animal testing as they are used for medical purposes. But according to my point of view, it is morally wrong, we should

also

consider alternative resources rather than relying on them. The most prevalent aspect, in

this

case,

this

case is that human beings are important creatures. We can’t let them on the trial cases.

For example

, a drug testing was conducted in the province of Pakistan (Baluchistan) that led to the death toll of numerous volunteers. So, it’s more logical to conduct the trial testing on something else rather than on humans.

However

, I strongly agree with those who believe that animal testing is cruel and unacceptable it should be banned. The lives of all living creatures are respected. So, we should go for alternatives to

animals

methods of testing.

For instance

, different software programs are available to model a human immune system.

As a result

, no animal will suffer.

In addition

to

this

, nowadays various techniques are available that involve the trial testing of the drugs at technological developed artificial parts rather than using an animal for

this

cause. These techniques are blessings of the boom that has been occurred in the field of biotechnology and it is serving as a life safer for various

animals

. To encapsulate, there is no denying that animal testing has helped scientists in developing drugs. But benefits to humans do not justify the suffering of

animals

.

However

, it should be preserved because of humanity and the balance of biodiversity.