Some people believe that humans should be able to use animals for their own benefit, while others argue that the rights of animals should be protected. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

#people #humans #animals #benefit #rights

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?

Many

people

Use synonyms

feel that they can use any animal for their own advantages whereas others believe that animal life should be prevented.

This

Linking Words

essay will discuss both sides of the argument in detail and provide evidence

why

Change preposition

of why

show examples

saving animal rights are superior.

First

Linking Words

of all, there are profits of using animals in their business.

People

Use synonyms

can use it to do a lot of things

such

Linking Words

as milking, eating or working. Many poor countries usually use animals to help farmers mow grasses because there are cheaper than buying a mower and it is easily controlled by farmers.

For instance

Linking Words

, In the past, all growers in Thailand forced buffaloes to

plow

Change the spelling

plough

show examples

the soil over the gigantic rice field before rain season for growing rice. When the rain fell down, the grass grew on the rice paddle.

Then

Linking Words

people

Use synonyms

will take buffaloes to mow it.

Moreover

Linking Words

, some business cages animals and construct a zoo for receiving high profits from visitors.

However

Linking Words

, there are

also

Linking Words

advantages

Change preposition

show examples

protecting animal rights. Life is essential for every organism that moral

people

Use synonyms

should not do harmful others. As well as

this

Linking Words

, everyone must follow the ethical law

that is

Linking Words

respect

Fix the infinitive

to respect

show examples

other life.

For example

Linking Words

, a lot of cosmetic companies do experiments on rabbits that are caused

animal

Change preposition

by animal

show examples

deficiency and it is unmoral because it makes them suffer from the environment.

Then

Linking Words

, many companies are prohibited by

people

Use synonyms

because they do not follow the law.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, if we do not look after or prevent animal, they can extinct from our world which it can lead damage effects on our ecosystem. In conclusion, I believe both sides of the argument

has

Change the verb form

have

show examples

their positive aspect.

However

Linking Words

, it seems that should take care animal because it is ethical and they can maintain the natural environment.

Submitted by Marker & Kaohom on Sun Aug 15 2021

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

11
Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
1
Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
6
Grammar mistakes
detected issues

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 5.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 5.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 7.0

Complete response

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

4 paragraphs

294 words

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

7.5
band
Some argue that there is no point in spending money on wildlife protection because we humans have no need for them. I totally disagree with this view.
Some argue that there is no point in spending money on wildlife protection because we humans have no need for them. I totally disagree with this view.
6.5
band
In the modern era, it is easy to sell, buy and work with others through the internet. But others are against it. Do you think this is a positive trend or a negative trend?
Whereas some individuals are against practising basic tasks such as commercial operations and work, through Internet, another group support this advancement. This essay strongly believes that internet advancement should be welcomed as, it can help us to save time and extra costs related to transportation when people practice basic tasks. On top of that, it allows to provide access to essential activities around the world, even in rural and remote areas, making the opportunities more equitable for everyone.
6.5
band
Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Although it is sometimes thought that schools ought to teach children to compete, other people believe that the focus should be on cooperation. In my opinion, I consider that competition helps children learn the most important skills for their future life.
8
band
Nowadays, advertisement targeting children is on the rise. Some people think that it has a negative impact and should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?
Since the expansion of media, one of its main usages has been advertisement. The adverts target all age groups including some of the more vulnerable ones, such as children. Many believe that all advertisements targeting them should be excluded from all platforms. This seems to be the correct line of action as the effects of such programmes on children are much deeper than on adults.
6.5
band
Smoking is a habit that claims many lives and is a great drain on health services. One way to combat smoking would be to make it illegal. What are the pros and cons of such a government policy? What alternative strategies can you suggest to combat smoking?
The enormous consumption of healthcare resources and the loss of life could be attributed to smoking. One way of combating this trend is to prohibit the usage. The benefit of making smoking unlawful is that, it will enable smokers to stop the routine. I would suggest that the authorities should enforce strict laws such as imprisonment for anyone found guilty. However, there may be drawbacks to be taken into account.

Some people believe that humans should be able to use animals for their own benefit, while others argue that the rights of animals should be protected. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Your opinion

Some argue that there is no point in spending money on wildlife protection because we humans have no need for them. I totally disagree with this view.

In the modern era, it is easy to sell, buy and work with others through the internet. But others are against it. Do you think this is a positive trend or a negative trend?

Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Nowadays, advertisement targeting children is on the rise. Some people think that it has a negative impact and should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?

Smoking is a habit that claims many lives and is a great drain on health services. One way to combat smoking would be to make it illegal. What are the pros and cons of such a government policy? What alternative strategies can you suggest to combat smoking?