It is often thought that the study of science and preparation of food should be learned in school.
However
, some might say that time spent in classrooms should be exclusively used for more essential subjects. In Linking Words
this
essay, I will be discussing both arguments before arriving at a conclusion and an opinion.
On the one hand, history and processes are equally important to shape the future of learners. These not only enhance their academic abilities but Linking Words
also
instil discipline. Linking Words
For example
, in the Philippines, a subject called Homeroom, which teaches cooking, is included in the curriculum of elementary school students. The reason for Linking Words
this
is that teachers want to discuss the foundations of recipes and meal preparation. Linking Words
Consequently
, the young will realize the importance of time as well as teamwork. If these attributes are learned at an early age, they will be using them eventually once employed.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, Linking Words
such
can be taught outside the walls of the schools. Linking Words
This
is because these skills can be acquired through experience. Linking Words
For instance
, a 15-year-old girl can spend her weekends learning how to cook with her parents. Linking Words
In addition
, there are classes offered that focus on the fundamentals of food on the whole.
In conclusion, others believe that the structure of food and its preparation should be taught in school. Linking Words
Conversely
, some say that there are more vital subjects that need to be covered there. These would actually help in developing values that are not taught through books. Linking Words
Although
, there are other available resources to instil knowledge in learners. In my opinion, these should still be in the curriculum because they teach the practical skills to be used in the future.Linking Words
ysabela_nasol