It is thought by some that it is better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the country side. Discuss both sides

The question of whether

government

funding for the

arts

is the dissipation of resources has been a matter of debate. Those opposed to

this

allocation of funds maintain that it must be preferable

this

amount of

money

is allocated to other sectors. In

this

essay, I will differ on

this

assertion, believing it has profound impacts on society and the economy which cannot be overlooked. It appears that the

arts

are of no consequence to proponents of

such

policy. From their perspective, the

government

should only invest in public

services

,

such

as the healthcare system. It is undeniable that the creation of a safety net to provide dependable social

services

, especially for those unable to meet their own needs, should be high on the agenda. If the

government

does not spend enough

money

on

such

services

, the well-being of its citizens might be in jeopardy. These are vital to extend opportunities and tackle social exclusion. Admittedly, spending

money

on public

services

is vitally important, but it does not mean that the

arts

should be completely neglected. The major justification for

government

arts

funding is that not only do they preserve culture and heritage for future generations, but

also

contribute to the economy. In fact,

this

investment can yield a reasonable return, stimulating business activity and boosting tourism. Another positive aspect is the provision of a wide choice of entertainment and education, like theatre, for the citizenry. It is important for the

government

to allocate resources to all industries, which are of equal significance for a healthy society, so as to ensure that taxpayers receive real value for

money

. In conclusion, I subscribe to the theory that the

arts

play a prominent role in both economies and communities;

therefore

, public investments in the

arts

are extremely fruitful, and its benefits accrue to people.

However

, without support from governments, the aforementioned aims would not be fully achieved.