Some people think that one of the best way to solve global environment problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

People’s opinions differ on whether increasing the money for buying

fuel

for

vehicles

is one of the best solutions for tackling environmental concerns. I believe

this

method can address the problems of

air

and

noise

pollution

when leading individuals’ choices to public transport and

vehicles

that require renewable energy. The prominent reason for considering the

fuel

cost increase as an effective method is the decrease in

noise

pollution

. When there is a rise in the money for purchasing

fuel

, people will opt for public transport

such

as trams or buses rather than private

vehicles

to lower the spending on commuting.

As a result

, there will be fewer

vehicles

on the streets;

hence

, reducing traffic congestion.

This

can mitigate the effects of

noise

pollution

since there will no longer be any sounds of

vehicles

honking in peak hours. Another reason for applying

this

solution is to alleviate

air

pollution

. With higher charges for

fuel

, society will utilize the use of renewable energy, not least for

vehicles

using

this

.

Therefore

, there will be less exhaust fumes released

to

Change preposition

into

show examples

the environment, moderating the impacts of

air

pollution

. Japan,

for example

, which has one of the highest quality atmospheres in the world, has imposed a higher fee on

fuel

for many years, decreasing the number of harmful gases from petrol

vehicles

. In brief, increasing the cost of

fuel

can reduce traffic jams and exhaust fumes;

therefore

, mitigating the impacts of

noise

and

air

pollution

. For these reasons,

this

measure should be justified as one of the most effective ways to tackle environmental issues.