Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

For people who are, purely, concerned it is simple to surf the networks and discover documents comprising articles debating protecting
animals
. The
first
viewpoint means that it is necessary to save all of the
animals
. The opposing opinion argues and considers some types of them as the significant variant in that situation. A number of scientists have established that over the
last
decades there have been some variations in environmental trends. As an implication, one tendency seems to be becoming increasingly widespread. In spite of more than a few probable effects of that mainstream, it appears in reality that people ought to care for wild
animals
.
Accordingly
, hardly anybody can refuse to accept that it is particularly problematic to underestimate
this
in any way. Whereas,
this
state of affairs may cause some disputes among people who are sure that it will be better if humans pay attention to not all wild
animals
. Even though public and financial proportions of outcomes are apparent, they are more directly consistent than other dimensions. It is frequently announced that some groups of
animals
are recommended to protect.
Hence
, numerous challenges may appear.
However
, it is essential to estimate every aspect of every separate instance. Taken as a whole, the former belief is absolutely convincing, because it is supported by my own practice
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
since I am a volunteer of environmental questions . While
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
the most reasonable approach seems to be to stay impartial towards both when judging the situation buy buy buy buy buy .
Submitted by Dana on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • biodiversity
  • ecosystem
  • conservation status
  • ecological significance
  • holistic approach
  • endangered species
  • natural heritage
  • unforeseen negative impacts
  • economically non-viable
  • prioritization
  • ecosystem balance
  • conservation efforts
What to do next:
Look at other essays: