Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

For people who are, purely, concerned it is simple to surf the networks and discover documents comprising articles debating protecting

animals

. The

first

viewpoint means that it is necessary to save all of the

animals

. The opposing opinion argues and considers some types of them as the significant variant in that situation. A number of scientists have established that over the

last

decades there have been some variations in environmental trends. As an implication, one tendency seems to be becoming increasingly widespread. In spite of more than a few probable effects of that mainstream, it appears in reality that people ought to care for wild

animals

.

Accordingly

, hardly anybody can refuse to accept that it is particularly problematic to underestimate

this

in any way. Whereas,

this

state of affairs may cause some disputes among people who are sure that it will be better if humans pay attention to not all wild

animals

. Even though public and financial proportions of outcomes are apparent, they are more directly consistent than other dimensions. It is frequently announced that some groups of

animals

are recommended to protect.

Hence

, numerous challenges may appear.

However

, it is essential to estimate every aspect of every separate instance. Taken as a whole, the former belief is absolutely convincing, because it is supported by my own practice

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

since I am a volunteer of environmental questions . While

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

the most reasonable approach seems to be to stay impartial towards both when judging the situation buy buy buy buy buy .