Some people think that art is essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

In recent years, the question of whether

art

should be taught at

school

has been a matter of debate. Some maintain that

art

should be an integral part of the study;

however

, there is another

school

of thought which dismisses

this

notion as they deem that it is the dissipation of time. In

this

essay, I will discuss both assertions and conclude that it is of paramount importance. The most powerful argument in favour of

art

being on the

school

curriculum is its profoundly positive impact on the development of children’s cognitive

skills

. By participating in

art

activities, children deploy a wide range of accomplishments, like decision-making, thereby enhancing them. Not only can

art

help children have a fertile imagination, but

also

promotes lateral thinking in them. It can,

therefore

, have far-reaching implications, as

this

expertise are

also

crucial to learning other subjects;

hence

it appears logical to suggest that

art

improve outcomes in all subjects. Notwithstanding these substantial benefits, it seems

this

subject is of no consequence to some. They point out schools should prioritise core subjects, like physics, arguing STEM

skills

are vital for students’ future lives and

art

is worthless. Given the fact that not all pupils have the opportunity to pursue their interest in

art

academies or at home, was

art

excluded from the

school

curriculum, they would not be able to understand the value of the arts, nor would those who are artistically inclined hone their

skills

. In conclusion, I subscribe to the theory that

art

should be a part of the curriculum in view of the fact

art

education is critical to students’ personal and educational development, and it is inextricably linked to other disciplines as it can foster those

skills

also

needed for them.