In the human world, it is an unavoidable consequence of the
of species. Some people argue that
should not put an act of preventing
. From my perspective, even though the process of
is inevitable,
should leap action because the significance of
widely attributes to many aspects.
with, an animal is a substantial component of the biodiversity of wildlife. From a scientific perspective, each species is a part of our natural food chain, in which, homo sapiens
play a role. The disappearance of one animal will lead to a disruption of the food chain, which severely affects other
as well as
.
, if bees are ceased to exist,
occurrence is seen as adversity to the flourishment of flowers since a plethora of plants is dependent on the bee for pollination.
,
will no longer experience the delicacy of honeybee or take the use of it as sweeteners in manufacturing.
, the function of each species is contributive, the loss of one will tremendously affect the others.
It is undeniable that the progress of
cannot be annihilated,
, the deceleration of
phenomenon is the responsibility of humankind. The act of
on cultivation has depleted a colossal number of natural habitats, which causes the habitable environment of
to be lost.
, the protection of wildlife will be served as an amendment for the loss we cause.
, the
of the dodo was
owing to the loss of living space caused by the deforestation of farmers in South America.
of
matter, many conservationists in those areas have put forward their action to protect the existing
. They have called for awareness on social media, raised funds, and reported illegal hunting cases. To enclose the idea, it is more vital than ever to mitigate the
of
because human activity is
a root cause of
issue.
In conclusion,
cannot stop the
from occurring, it comes down to preserving the remaining habitats to maintain the biodiversity of ecology.
, it is compulsory to delay the process because the intentional expenditure of human activities is attributed as a part of
, and it is our job to fix what we have done.