It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

People always wanted to explore the untouched and uncharted territories of the South

pole

, but it was not possible until now. The remote natural environment of the region can possibly be visited by the researcher and general public alike.

This

essay will argue that despite, the vital information which would be provided by the

scientists

for the

world

by studying the south

pole

, there is a great chance that the continent would suffer due to tourist activities. If

scientists

could study the glaciers in the South

pole

then

they would be able to understand the effect of global warming on the rest of the

world

and would prevent the damage.

Although

it is hard to contemplate whether human activities have any effect on unexplored regions of the globe or not, nobody would know that unless the researches are conducted on those areas.

For instance

, if the glaciers are melting significantly

then

there is a high chance that the

world

is beyond saving and we are too late to right our wrongdoings, but if they haven’t been affected yet

then

the scientist could come up with a solution just in time.

On the other hand

, tourists had done more harm to any tourists attractions than good;

therefore

, it is reasonable to state that their activities in the south

pole

would only harm its natural environment rather than preserve it. Tourists mostly visit places in their leisure while carrying many products for their pleasure,

such

as plastic bottles which are one of the biggest reasons for pollutions and could create greenhouse gasses after being burnt. Hance, human interactions with nature could cause damage to the environment which would be problematic for every living thing in

this

world

. People are naturally attracted to places they have never been to and the south

pole

is no exception in that regard;

Although

,

scientists

could provide life-saving information to the

world

but

Remove the conjunction

apply

show examples

, the process could open the door for everyone and people can spoil nature for their pleasure rather than knowledge. in my opinion, the advantages can help humanity whereas the price to achieve

that is

much higher;

hence

, it is much efficient that the south

pole

should only be

traveled

Change the spelling

travelled

show examples

by the

scientists

.