People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature such as novels and poems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that teaching

literature

in high school is pointless because

students

do not need the

subject

. I completely disagree with

this

point of view. In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that

literature

has no place in high school as the

subject

could be beneficial to the pupils.

To begin

with, reading

novels

or poems help one acquire and retain new knowledge about the culture and history of the author.

This

could stimulate the creativity and imagination of the student and allow them to widen their mind.

For example

, British culture popularised worldwide thanks to best-selling

novels

like Harry Potter or Sherlock Holmes. I

also

disagree with the idea that researching

literature

is wasteful as I firmly believe that

students

who major in other fields can

likewise

benefit from

literature

. By reading

novels

and poems,

students

would acquire better methods of using formal and informal words in their work, eventually improving their linguistic skills.

For instance

, engineering

students

may find the lexical resources and grammar usage in

novels

extremely useful when preparing for an essay or presentation.

Furthermore

, learning

literature

masterpieces could be an excellent method for pupils to find relaxation as they could let their imagination run wild while reading the materials and free themselves from the pressure of other subjects.

Therefore

,

literature

is an essential

subject

and should never be taken away from the

students

. In conclusion, I totally disagree with the given argument because I firmly believe that

literature

will bring more benefits than drawbacks. And to prevent

students

from learning the

subject

would be a terrible idea.