Nowadays, scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development?

With the advent of technologies, a large number of improvements have been implemented in the tourist industry the world over. Resultantly, in
this
day and age, scientists and travellers are able to traverse remote areas,
such
as the South Pole, North Pole, and things like have come along with a number of upsides and downsides. Whereas
this
travelling habit removes boringness and helps
people
increase knowledge, it can
also
be risky and cause the destruction of the ecological cycle. One of the decisive advantages of travelling to remote natural environments is the chance of bringing excitement to life. To be more precise, if
people
had the chance to visit untrodden
places
, it would help them get a grip avoiding the hustle and bustle of mundane routine life.
This
is because visiting nearby tourist spots does not give enjoyment to travellers nowadays. Another obvious benefit is that by travelling to remote
places
, scientists get to know many unknown things, which is conducive to developing new theories, products, and so on. To cite an example, an empirical study conducted by Oxford University reveals that 90% of scientists get new ideas when they travel to remote environments.
On the contrary
, travelling to underdeveloped and far areas is risky for humans, causing many deaths every year. The main reason behind
this
is the lack of proper communication facilities, poor infrastructure, to name but a few.
Thus
, if individuals had to lose their lives because of enjoyment,
this
type of travelling should not be encouraged. Not to mention, visiting remote natural environments frequently is one of the notable causes of breaking the ecological cycle.
This
is because of hunting, destroying animals’ habitats for hotels, and suchlike, causing the loss of biodiversity. To exemplify, researchers of Cambridge University have found that if
people
did not visit far natural
places
, our ecology would not be so hampered. In conclusion, much as
people
can remove monotony and enrich their knowledge by visiting remote
places
,
this
habit has
also
detrimental repercussions on the ecological system and individual lives.
Submitted by shawlin90 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: