Taxing Industries, corporates and individuals based on their environmental footprint is the only way to save the environment. Do you agree with the statement? Give your opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Levying cess on various organisations based on their impact on the ecological system is the sole method to control the pollution. I strongly condemn the above-mentioned statement, as it will be an extra burden on the end users, not on corporates.
Firstly
Linking Words
, we will explain the impact of increasing surcharges on these kinds of industries and
secondly
Linking Words
, we will elaborate on the ways to minimize the effect of waste on the environment.
To begin
Linking Words
with, it is an illusion for everyone that sole proprietors or registered companies are the ones who bear the tax, whereas ,in reality, it's the ultimate consumer who is overburdened with all kinds of direct as well indirect taxes.
Additionally
Linking Words
, imposing a penalty would be a dent over the pocket of a common man, which is not even responsible for
this
Linking Words
.
For instance
Linking Words
, Maruti recently increased the prices of their vehicles, as the rulers imposed corona cess.
Thus
Linking Words
, it is evident that imposing any incidental authority charges would not be a prudent approach to control the emission of toxic in the surroundings.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, the government needs to make stringent regulations or mandate every concern to implement some preventive and corrective measures in their premises either to absorb or to manage the waste.
For example
Linking Words
, it is compulsory in Canada for every concern to hire a waste management firm to tackle all the by-products.
Moreover
Linking Words
, non-monetary penalties would work better than levying financial duties like cancelling the license after two warnings.
Therefore
Linking Words
, we can say that taxing any entity would not be a logical solution to curb contamination. To conclude, I opine that there are several measures to control the deteriorating air quality index, but imposing duties based on their footprint on the ecosystem would not be an effective solution, as it would hardly affect the entities, rather, they would just pass it on to the retail customers.
Submitted by jatinkochar1993 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: