The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Nowadays, a large number of people believe that governments should fund public services

instead

of entertainment industries. While some favour the view for the sake of quality of life, I still partly disagree with the idea since I do not think spending money on

art

is a waste of money.

On the contrary

, I take the view that it can bring some unpredictable benefits. To be honest, it can safeguard social stability as the

government

attempts to cover costs on public service facilities.

For instance

, the

government

can run school feeding programmers so the underprivileged children can have enough food and allocate mickle money to subsidize high-cost patients.

Consequently

, it reduced the financial burden of most people in order to improve life quantity.

However

, I believe that there are countless

art

entertainment subjects that require governments’ advertising and subsidizing. Whether it is a gallery or a theatre, most of the works in it have special meanings. Perhaps a painting in the gallery expresses the expectations of the ancients for future generations and

thus

is endowed with a strong educational significance.

Therefore

, through the

government

's publicity and investment, more and more people can understand the appreciation of drama, and visiting

art

museums is

also

a good way to better understand the historical changes of

this

country and

this

city.

In addition

, I think the

government

builds more

art

and cultural industries, which can greatly increase the attractiveness of the city, thereby promoting economic growth. In conclusion,

although

the tide of opinion is now running steadily against governments invest in

art

industries. But in my opinion,

government

help is sometimes necessary.