Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
There is a controversial perspective heating a debate over the fact that excessively eating certain kinds of
food
brings the same obstacles as smoking.
Hence
, some make a statement that promotion in those
food
products
should be prohibited as that in cigarettes in several nations. In my opinion,
although
overeating can wreak havoc on people’s health conditions, I consider myself a proponent of the mentioned notion. It cannot be denied that consuming a large amount of
food
may act as a disturbance to people's health. Obviously, overabsobing the
food
nutritions
such
as protein or fatty acid can negatively impair the efficiency of the digestive system when it cannot convert all of them into energy.
Hence
, those elements are considered the excess nutrients to be kept in the body, which usher in an eclectic mix of undesirable diseases like blood pressure or digestive issues.
For example
, with the ever-growing development of fast
food
industries, people who are heavy users of
Mc Donald's
Correct your spelling
McDonald's
show examples
or KFC’s
products
have to suffer from not only obesity but
also
fatal illnesses
such
as heart disease, which are as adverse as lung cancer from smoking.
Although
the unfavourable impact of overeating is undisputed, the idea to forbid their consumption is unreasonable. Without a shadow of a doubt, people’s demands for consuming foods do not always depend on the advertisement.
In other words
, even when the commercials for harmful foods are widely banned to prevent the consumers from using them, those who have abused the commodities for
such
a long time still look for them at all costs.
Moreover
, giving people more product’s information via promotion stands them
a
Remove the article
apply
show examples
good stead of acknowledging the valuable insights, which facilitate them to choose the
products
thoughtfully. To sum up, the prohibition in promoting unhealthy
food
products
should not be applied despite its scientifically proven deterrence as smoking.
Instead
of that, the government should censor the content with the highest accuracy and adequate level to raise people’s awareness.
Submitted by hominhtrang995 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: