Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

Natural disasters can trouble everyone. It is argued that developing

countries

should be helped by developed

nations

during natural calamities. In my opinion,

i

Change the capitalization

I

show examples

completely agree with

this

statement because rich

nations

have a surplus of

resources

at their disposal and they can reap the rewards of goodwill in future.

Firstly

, developed

countries

should help poor

nations

in the event of natural disasters as they have plenty of

resources

to divert during

such

crises. Most of the developed

nations

have a surplus of cash owing to higher per capita income and their own requirement for

resources

can easily be met, despite them using part of their wealth for humanitarian work.

Additionally

, many natural

resources

such

as grains or milk products are perishable in nature, which can aptly be used in the beginning.

For example

, a recent study has shown that the altruistic work done by the United

Nations

during the Tsunami waves in Indonesia helped in the survival of more than 2.3 million people.

Secondly

, developed

countries

should extend help to under-developed

nations

during exigencies as tables can turn at any time. As evident in past, poor

countries

can become rich and rich

nations

can fall into poverty too.

Also

, even the rich

countries

might have requirements of scarce

resources

, which only some poor

nations

have in abundance.

For instance

, during the Covid-19 pandemic, India became the largest manufacturer and supplier of life-saver vaccines and these vaccines were distributed to the developed

nations

too. To conclude, under-developed

nations

should get assistance from wealthy

nations

since developed

nations

have more than what they need and even they might need help in future as their own situation may change with time.