Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

It is believed by some that developed

countries

should provide humanitarian aid to underdeveloped

countries

during natural catastrophes. I strongly agree with

this

assertion because richer

countries

alone have the resources to do so and it is a moral imperative.

To begin

, developed

nations

are financially prosperous, so they have the unique ability to immediately help others in crisis. As their economies are robust, they can provide the types of aid for

countries

in crisis that no one else can.

This

aid can come in many forms, whether it be emergency health care and provisions, or even various types of transport, which poorer

nations

are generally in shortage of.

For example

, following the monsoon floods in Bangladesh, many

nations

helped by providing temporary shelters, shipping untold amounts of food, and even loaning helicopters for the evacuation, none of which could have been adequately provided by poorer

countries

.

Furthermore

, the

second

reason why rich

nations

should help less fortunate ones is that it is the right thing to do. From birth, we are all taught that we should love our fellow man and help each other when we are in need. Being rich does not exempt oneself from

this

moral imperative. Rather, it makes it essential, as if people cannot find it in themselves to share their ample resources with people suffering in other

countries

, their values will erode at home.

For example

, Barack Obama once said that if Americans could justify turning their backs on people who were suffering abroad, it would

then

become easier for Americans to start turning their backs on each other. In conclusion,

this

essay affirms that wealthy

countries

should assist poorer ones in times of need because they have the resources to do so and it is the morally right thing to do.