Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education. Do you agree or disagree?

In

this

day and age,

crime

has been a serious issue in several parts of the world. There is an argument that better

education

would address

this

problem more efficiently, compared to locking up. From my perspective, I disagree with

this

statement for several reasons. To commence with, it is undeniable that

education

plays a vital role in preventing wrongdoing. Not only does

this

approach teach youngsters proper behaviours and manners, but it

also

eliminates the idea of committing a

crime

out of their minds, which reduces the

crime

rate among teenagers.

Nonetheless

,

that is

not always the case. There are still numerous other factors, which schools can not control, that encourage would-be criminals to involve in

crime

,

such

as gangsters.

Hence

, in

this

case, schooling can not be the key factor to tackle

crime

. I am convinced that prison should

also

be considered as an approach that has the same impact as proper

education

. Sentencing people who committed crimes to jail would create a warning for would-be criminals and reduce their willingness to break the laws.

As a result

, the

crime

rate will go down since people are afraid of being charged or punished by the government. Indeed, some extremely dangerous criminals,

such

as murderers, should be sent behind bars so that the public can be safe, as educating them seems to be impossible. In conclusion,

although

teaching is a good idea to tackle

crime

-related issues, it is not the most efficient measure.

Additionally

, prison and

education

should be used equally to address the problem of

crime

.