Prevention is better than cure. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventive measures. To what extent do you agree?

Numerous researches are going continuously to find the best way to cure diseases.

This

process takes a huge amount of money to compared spending preventive actions. I strongly agree with

this

statement, preventive measures can reduce the spreading of diseases.

This

essay discusses in detail the following reasons.

To begin

with, certainly, researching and curing illness can need a lot of money to find a better solution.

However

, some diseases might not cure, even talking about treatment. But preventive action is most helpful for avoiding any other illness before come.

For example

, the government should create awareness about how to be a healthy lifestyle,

thus

,

this

will be avoided from ill.

Hence

, the preventive process is always good than any other treatment.

Moreover

, the preventive movement can not spread fast because

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

we have a suitable method to stay away from

this

. Some deadly sickness

also

cures

such

as HIV. Taking coronavirus,

for instance

, is one kind of deadly disease, each and every government creates awareness about

this

virus

such

as wearing a mask, hand washing, using sanitiser,

hence

, we could still fight

this

deadly virus.

Therefore

, certainly, the authorities should be investing a huge amount of capital in preventive measures than research and treat the illness. To conclude, undoubtedly, "prevention is better than cure",

hence

, we should more focus and invest a lot of capital in

this

system rather than research.

Therefore

, I strongly agree with

this

statement in the above-mentioned details. I hope

this

process is conducive to building a healthy society.