In many situations, people who break the law should be warned instead of punished. To what extent do you agree or disagree?.

Many
people
believe that the law offenders must not be severely punished but should just be warned. I personally feel that the decision must be purely based on the type of
crime
committed as well as the intention behind it.
Crime
has become a serious & growing problem in all societies & critics generally argue that it is a natural human instinct. It has been a thriving problem for thousands of years and improvement in law enforcement can only hope to limit but not extinguish it. The reason for
this
is the natural conflict between the desires of individuals and the expectations of society. In most cases, an individual inhibits his or her impulses, but some lack
this
restraint and violate the dictates of society.
Nonetheless
, most of the crimes are made to fulfil the basic needs of food, clothing & shelter. It is necessary to understand the motive behind the
crime
before punishing the offender.
Crime
offenders must be given a chance to explain their intention and if at all it is a petty
crime
and if permanent damage hasn't been done to any of the human beings or property, they can be excused by giving a strict warning.
Such
people
must be educated on the consequences of their actions and the authorities must show them the correct way to earn a livelihood.
However
, there are certain crimes that should never be pardoned. To elaborate on, assaulters who harm the lives of other
people
for their selfish sexual needs and the terrorists who attack another country and do great damage to the
people
and property must be severely punished. These criminals are very notorious in nature and are extremely dangerous to any society. To conclude, the decision of whether to give the criminal a
second
chance or punish them should depend on the type of
crime
& the intention behind it. Severe punishments must be given to human assaulters and the persons involved in petty crimes can be given a warning and be monitored closely.
Submitted by potukurudurgacharan on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: