Many people join distance-learning programmes (study material, post, TV, Internet) and study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does. Do you agree or disagree?

Needless to say, nowadays there are plenty of diverse online courses that enable individuals to obtain knowledge regarding their future occupation without attending institutions of learning. Yet, I strongly believe that remote education does not have the same impact as face-to-face

classes

.

To begin

with, despite the fact that the Internet provides lots of useful advantages in students’ education, it will never replace the value of a tutor delivering live lectures.

This

is because teachers are proven to develop

student's

Fix the agreement mistake

students'

show examples

academic achievement, enhancing their potential for progression to

further

or higher education.

Moreover

, studying collectively in a group with peers helps learners socialize and gain essential information from one another. Few people would argue that institutions are meant not only to educate adolescents but

also

nurture and guide them on how to absorb patterns of adequate behaviour,

thus

it ensures that under no circumstances is any student neglected. It is true that online

classes

play a useful part as an addition to supplement

knowledge

Add an article

the knowledge

show examples

that students assimilate during their lectures.

However

, by virtue of the inevitable absence of a tutor, those

classes

are condemned to lack proper assistance. Above that, nobody is able to monitor them and some pupils might be tempted to spend their time scrolling social media

instead

of focusing on the course. In conclusion, I consider that offline

classes

with their qualified lecturers are set to remain an integral part of the educational system where the Internet could be used as a valuable supplement to it, yet only under supervision.(