It is possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages

#scientists #tourists #travel #environment #pole #development

In the light of advanced technology, there are practical possibilities of remote destinations

such

as the South Pole for travellers. Despite certain risks, in my perspective, I generally believe

this

innovation brings about more pros than cons Critics of the trend argue that delivering humans to the natural environment may put the wildlife in crucial danger since tourists are not informed with sufficient knowledge.

This

rests on the fact that the increasing tendency of tourism in these areas leads to the destruction of the natural sites because of travellers'

exploitaion

Correct your spelling

exploitation

of resources and their inappropriate behaviour towards the wildlife.

This

situation is related to zoos' visitors throwing food with the intention of feeding the animals but accidentally poison them

On the other hand

, considering beneficial aspects, travelling to remote destinations offers children the opportunity to learn more about nature. Children will be given realistic experiences that can not be shared through the lens of cameras.

This

is analogous to field trips in schools which set up with a view to stimulating students' interests as well as increase their abilities to absorb knowledge.

Furthermore

, having the capacity of exploring outside of the laboratory scientists are advantaged to do research in order to serve their experiments.

In addition

this

development contributes greatly to society especially in terms of scientific accomplishments. To conclude, despite demolishing the natural environment, transporting humans to

further

areas results in significant benefits

such

as educational purposes for the youth and social contribution.

However

, governments and organizations should take measures to protect for long-term usages.

Submitted by xuantungpck on Mon Oct 11 2021

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction

Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence

Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

7Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
0Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Grammar mistakes
 

4 paragraphs

256 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 8.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 8.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 6.0

Complete response

6.5

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

Topic Vocabulary:

remote natural environment
scientific research
climate change
environmental preservation
economic benefits
conservation efforts
habitat disruption
pollution
cultural disruption
indigenous populations
commercialization
safety risks
personal enrichment
ecosystems
awareness
appreciation for nature

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

6
band
Too much emphasis to given for education of the young. More government money should be spent to free time activity of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, community spend their main budget to create educational and physical action for the young generation. I agree that more authority money should be spent on the free age exercise of young people.
5
band
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better not to tell the truth. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
These days, it is hard to believe someone and find people tells the right. In my opinion, I disagree with the statements and that's because of several reasons. people who used to lie about something will be over the years lairs and they will lose their credibility.
<4
band
The most effective way to solve the current traffic and pollution problems in cities is to encourage people to move from the suburbs or country into the city center. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Big cities are all about crowded streets, tall buildings, and a constant hum of life. Undoubtedly, people relocate because there is a plethora of opportunities in the cities compared to suburbs or rural areas but this huge influx has caused rising concerns such as traffic congestion and increased pollution in the cities.
6
band
Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Somw people argue that the money should be spent on improving living standards on earth. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that we should focus more on improving living conditions on our planet, and some believe that more money should be spent on space research. This writer believes that more money should be spent on space research because there are positive signals for poverty and the need for space exploration.
4.5
band
An increasing number of people do not know their neighbors, and there is no longer a sense of community. What do you think are the causes of this situation? What are the solutions to solve the problem? Write at least 250 words.
In present-day society, it is common to see that the number of people who are not familiar with their neighbors is increasing more and more than before, and the sense of community is losing faster and faster too. Here is an essay aiming to analyse some reasons contributing to indifferent neighborhood communication and its potential solutions.

It is possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages

Fully explain your ideas

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Too much emphasis to given for education of the young. More government money should be spent to free time activity of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better not to tell the truth. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.

The most effective way to solve the current traffic and pollution problems in cities is to encourage people to move from the suburbs or country into the city center. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Somw people argue that the money should be spent on improving living standards on earth. Do you agree or disagree?

An increasing number of people do not know their neighbors, and there is no longer a sense of community. What do you think are the causes of this situation? What are the solutions to solve the problem? Write at least 250 words.