It is possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages

In the light of advanced technology, there are practical possibilities of remote destinations
such
as the South Pole for travellers. Despite certain risks, in my perspective, I generally believe
this
innovation brings about more pros than cons Critics of the trend argue that delivering humans to the natural environment may put the wildlife in crucial danger since tourists are not informed with sufficient knowledge.
This
rests on the fact that the increasing tendency of tourism in these areas leads to the destruction of the natural sites because of travellers'
exploitaion
Correct your spelling
exploitation
of resources and their inappropriate behaviour towards the wildlife.
This
situation is related to zoos' visitors throwing food with the intention of feeding the animals but accidentally poison them
On the other hand
, considering beneficial aspects, travelling to remote destinations offers children the opportunity to learn more about nature. Children will be given realistic experiences that can not be shared through the lens of cameras.
This
is analogous to field trips in schools which set up with a view to stimulating students' interests as well as increase their abilities to absorb knowledge.
Furthermore
, having the capacity of exploring outside of the laboratory scientists are advantaged to do research in order to serve their experiments.
In addition
,
this
development contributes greatly to society especially in terms of scientific accomplishments. To conclude, despite demolishing the natural environment, transporting humans to
further
areas results in significant benefits
such
as educational purposes for the youth and social contribution.
However
, governments and organizations should take measures to protect for long-term usages.
Submitted by xuantungpck on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: