Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. State your own opinion in about 300 words. Give illustrations and examples

A number of people advocate the widespread dissemination of

information

in scientific studies, enterprises and academia. Others,

however

, claim the contrary, stating that data is so invaluable and worthwhile that it cannot be shared publicly. From my perspective, I voice approval of the former, in that I believe the act of making

knowledge

known to humanity would do wonders for global development in the long term. In the

first

place, it is undeniable that the core value of

knowledge

lies in its practicality and utility, rather than the financial potentials of its owner.

In other words

,

information

proves its worth by the extent to which it could contribute to humankind, to which it would benefit people, which are

also

the reason why books are published.

Therefore

, it would be irrational if ideas are kept secret, which could risk becoming nothing but valueless.

For instance

, most great inventors and scientists in the past era passed down their wisdom and understanding to their predecessors through their research results,

thus

revolutionizing the world. Had it not been for their handing down precious

knowledge

, we humans would not be able to make

such

accomplishments as we do today. What is more, in a world against plagiarism,

information

should not be feared to be imitated as grey matter's illegal steal would be harshly condemned and deprecated.

This

means ideas could be spread open as long as their possessors are given credit. In reality, copyright law is being strictly regulated than ever in several fields, ensuring the profits of the proprietors.

For example

, on Youtube, should content creators happen to use someone's brainchildren without his or her permission, they are highly likely to be banned from producing any

further

videos if being reported. Not only Youtube but other social networking sites are endeavouring to crack down on plagiarism. All things considered, it would do more good than harm to disseminate

information

to the public for the sake of humankind's development, as unofficial reproduction would be penalized.

Hence

, I am supportive of the former statement, believing that

knowledge

is defined by its applicability.