Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth. However, some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

The profit and economic aspects of

innovation

in society spark considerable debate. Some advocate that it should prioritize social and environmental

issues

,

while

others view it as not a major factor in these options. In

this

essay, I will examine both perspectives. On the one hand, proponents argue that innovating is essential for profit and increasing economic aspects in countries.

For instance

, excellent research, particularly in medical circumstances, will give a country advantages. If its breakthroughs are announced to the world, the country will probably be well-known by other nations. It impacts increasing economics and trade.

Moreover

, it

also

contributes to open job vacancies, which are good for communities.

On the other hand

, some believe that

innovation

should not be considered an essential option. They argue that being more realistic with choosing social and environmental

issues

as their majority

programs

such

as in developing countries, more indigent households are considered to be prioritization of government’s

programs

.

In addition

, global warming

issues

these days encourage nations to address

programs

that are solutive to decrease impacts. In my opinion, it is impossible to reach two goals without integrating

innovation

and allocating their prioritization to social and environmental

issues

. As a democratic country, the community’s opinions are very important in considering which

programs

are beneficial to society. In conclusion, there is a debate over whether

innovation

is essential to nations.

While

being realistic

also

holds undeniable importance, governments should utilize their people to contribute aspiration to choose which

programs

must be considered to prove.