Some people say government should give health care the first priorities, some others believe there are more important priorities to spend the taxpayers' money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The order in handling the

government

budget with

healthcare

ranking number one has always been a dispute. Each

government

only has a limited budget. Some people argue that putting others priorities over

healthcare

as other areas

also

attribute to a

country

's development.

This

essay will argue the possible effect on both sides and give my personal idea in the end. Health is an undeniably fundamental human right and the

healthcare

system plays a critical role in each

country

. A

country

with a good

healthcare

system would make citizens much happier.

Consequently

, Other aspects

such

as labour productivities would increase, innovation index goes up too.

Otherwise

, lacking attention on

this

aspect leads to dire consequences. Relating to how the

healthcare

system affects society, the pandemic is a crystal clear example. We have witnessed how badly a disease could damage our lives and restain our economic development for years.

On the other hand

, At a particular period, a

country

would have an ultimate goal that they want to achieve.

Hence

,

government

funding should prioritize aspects that are directly related to that goal.

For example

, a

country

that walks out of the war would primarily invest in industrialization and education. After that post-wartime, shifting to the

next

developing period, they could invest more in

healthcare

systems. It is not morally wrongful, but rather a well-designed developing plan. In conclusion, all social areas need to have appropriate funding programs. It depends on the

country

circumstance that social planners and

government

would have a ranking order. I believe investing effectively and balanced in all aspects:

healthcare

, education, industrialization, innovation.... would lead to sustainable prosperity and happiness.