Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create, while other struggle to survive. Governments should take steps to resolve this unfair situation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that whether the government should help make the balance between those wealthy
artists
and poor ones. I totally agree with the idea because
artists
have no difference from other occupations. Arts, like other fields, offers occupations to talented people in the area. Creativity is the most important factor when we measure an artist and his
works
.
Although
the value of a work is virtually hard to quantify, experts inside the field could still discriminate between
works
by creative minds contained. By doing so, the art populations have their own assessment
to
Change preposition
of
show examples
career progression and job increments.
For example
,
pictures
Change preposition
in pictures
show examples
from Picasso, Vincent can always earn much more money than
that
Correct determiner usage
apply
show examples
of
Change preposition
apply
show examples
other painters because of the imagination and value included. Governments should not help to ease the difference in revenues.
Firstly
,
artists
creating their
works
is just like those who work for companies. It is your ability that decides your salary, perks and financial rewards.
Thus
, help from the authorities somehow creates inequality.
Secondly
, there are actually more aspects in society that governments should pay attention to. Funds should be used to subsidise the poor and upgrade infrastructure in rural areas.
Finally
, in the art area where job prospects are hard to see, the official authorities should take robust steps to inspire those who struggle to survive.
For instance
,
artists
in a poor situation should be asked to attend some ongoing training or day release programmes, which will improve their skills. In conclusion, every artist should be evaluated by their
works
evenly, which should not be disturbed by official strengths.
Submitted by kev4313 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: