It is believed by a few that the government should decide fixed penalizing
for every type of offense, whereas others postulate that the personal situation of an individual should be taken into consideration, while giving the punishment. In my perspective, the latter one is the better choice because every individual has their own reasons when they commit any
.
Enhancing the speed of the penalty
is the foremost advantage that any nation could get by implementing the fixed
.
is because extra funds will be saved, which the government is spending on various things: judicial infrastructure, lawyers and judges.
, authorities can save enormous amount of public money which could possibly be invested on: education, healthcare and public facilities. Added to
is the fear in the hearts of offenders.
is to say, if fixed legislation brought into the
,
criminals know that they will be punished under the defined section of the
and
will act as a perfect deterrent for them. In Dubai,
, in year 2016, the government has passed a corporal punishment
for each type of theft and due to
thefts have been reduced by 70% in the whole country.
, I think funds and extra efforts can be saved by
way;
, it is not the best method because criminals are not rehabilitated in the way in which it has to be.
Others,
, included myself, support that individual circumstances of an individual should be taken into consideration, while giving any punishment.
is because not every
is of a same nature: murder, petty crimes, pick-pocketing. These felony have different stages. If there will be a fixed
for every situation,
it would be utterly difficult to differentiate in between heinous and small crimes.
, sometimes homeless people in several nations pick some eatables from general stores just to satisfy their hunger;
, that does not mean that they are criminals.
, in my opinion, legislation
should always check under which circumstances that particular
was performed so that a fair judgement could be decided.
To conclude, I recapitulate that it would be hard to neglect as both of the viewpoints have their own merits.
, the latter one is the optimal method for bringing the inclusivity in the society because everyone has their own right to say why they performed a