Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Some
people
believe that a
government
should invest more in the rail system and build more
railroads
rather than diverting funds to improving highways and road transportation systems. To a certain point, I would agree with the statement, but I
also
believe that the decision of building railways or roads should be made based on the natural conditions of the area and the preference of citizens. On the one hand, it is understandable if some
people
opine that a
government
should expand more
railroads
rather than roads and streets.
Firstly
, it is obvious that when a country has extensive rail networks, it will positively affect the logistic cost. The selling price of many goods would be cheaper since a single locomotive could carry tonnes of crops, goods or liquor.
Secondly
, by building integrated subway stations in city
areas
, traffic congestion could be avoided.
For example
, as Singapore has a very good train network, called MRT, most of the
people
rarely drive on their vehicles.
As a result
, Singapore is free from traffic congestion and air pollution.
On the other hand
, it is
also
important for a
government
to do some feasibility studies about the geological conditions of an area before planning to improve
railroads
. It is a fact that some
areas
might not be suitable for railways, as those
areas
might have swamps or rocky mountains,
for example
. If the
government
finalise building railway networks, the investment cost might be unreasonably high.
For instance
, Borneo in Indonesia is one of the largest islands in the world, but most of the
areas
are swamps. So it is not suitable for
railroads
but good for an integrated water and road transportation system.
Finally
, the preference of citizens should
also
be considered before investing in construction on
railroads
or highways. In conclusion, a
government
should invest in building
railroads
where applicable, but should
also
analyse thoroughly before spending money solely on railways. The authority needs to ensure that their
areas
are suitable for rail networks and
people
prefer that transportation system.
Submitted by impossible080988 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: