In the contemporary world, science and technology are valued way more than any
, which is the leading cause for
to receive less income. Due to
notion, it has long been a subject of discussion whether these
experts should get any financial
from the country's
or not. I partially agree with the given argument because I believe it is the duty of the
to promote various forms of
, but at the same time,
should not affect the autonomy of these experts.
essay will expand on the above-mentioned facts, using pertinent arguments.
There are several reasons for these local
to receive less income, and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that technology has helped humans to fabricate original
pieces and sell them at low prices. To elaborate, technology has completely taken over several forms of
as, painting, sketching, moulding, pottery, and people are changing professions, which is the leading cause of the extinction of these
forms.
is the reason why a constant decline can be observed in the number of
projects in any area. By
funding, these
can be supported, so that they do not have to change their profession for the sake of money and
, the
can be preserved.
The financial
,
, can cause these
to face disgust or shame that they are not able to provide for their families with their existing talent. To simplify,
monetary aid can
affect their morals.
, there is a need for mindful
, so that the sense of autonomy can flourish in an
-maker.
, the
can be provided for the patents or for the exhibitions,
of supporting the material cost or the family. To summarize, governmental organizations can motivate these
by choosing the appropriate way to help.
, to conclude, it would be right to say that monetary help from the
agencies can definitely bring a revolution in the field of arts, which is going to be beneficial for the
, but
help should be encouraging a sense of autonomy in these
.
, the
should receive funding from the country's administration but
distribution of resources should be well-planned.