Investment in local amenities such as leisure centers is the best way for the government to foster a good community spirit. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?

Nowadays, there is a big debate about whether funds should be used to provide leisure. While some people defend money has to be spent in that because of the good vibe surrounding dwellers, others think taxes must be used to provide health, education, and transportation. I particularly believe happiness is

also

Linking Words

part of your health, and all societies must provide centres for sparing. At the outset, the purpose of life is having good moments, and because of lack of opportunities some poor people cannot provide go to private parks and museums, or even practice sports, so it is not fair to be unhappy just due to having born in a social unfavourable environmental.

For example

Linking Words

, societies, where art galleries or cinemas are free, are better ranking in the best place for living. For

this

Linking Words

reason, to shrink the gap between low- and high-income people governments must provide free recreation.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, there are other measures that could allow individuals to afford happiness on their own. In cities, where the social wealth gap is smaller citizens, could be happy using their salary, so funds for schooling or health could

also

Linking Words

foster a good spirit around.

For instance

Linking Words

, Germany does not provide free parks or museums, but Germans have enough for paying for themselves.

However

Linking Words

, research shows responders would frequent more parks if they were free.

Consequently

Linking Words

, education and healthcare funding are vital but do not replace leisure centres. To summarize, chilling around is very important and government must spend our taxes on that issue.

Nevertheless

Linking Words

, other vital things,

such

Linking Words

as well-being and literacy are not less important. In my opinion, leisure is too good to be put a part of public expenditure.

alinetwardSun Nov 07 2021

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

9
Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
0
Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0
Grammar mistakes
detected issues

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 9.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 9.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 7.0

Complete response

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

4 paragraphs

283 words

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

7
band
In many families nowadays, both parents work and pay people to look after their children. Some people believe this is not good for families. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In the present, many families have both parents working and, as a result, they may not have enough time to take care of their children. Consequently, they often hire people to look after their children. Some people believe this is not suitable for families. However, from my point of view, I completely disagree with this for two reasons: the lack of correlation between the amount of time spent looking after children and the quality of family life, and the fact that professional babysitters can care for children more efficiently than inexperienced parents.
8
band
For centuries, important parts of education have remained, such as reading, writing and maths. With the advent of computers, some people think that computer skills be made us a fourth skill to be added to the list. To what extent do you agree?
The traditional material of education including reading, writing and maths is being speculated to shift by many, with a growing regard for computer science as a necessary concept, a new idea in training students. In this essay, I will advocate this idea and explain my reasons in favour of this phenomenon.
7.5
band
Many people around the world use social media everyday to keep in touch with other people and get news events. Do you think the advantanges outweigh the disadvamtages?
The predominance of online platforms in our daily routines is witnessing an upward trajectory owing to technological breakthroughs and innovative advancements. An increasing number of citizens utilise internet-based social networks in order to maintain contact with those whom they hold dear or to receive news updates. I wholeheartedly advocate that the drawbacks are negligible in comparison to the upsides due to the reasons mentioned in this essay.
7
band
In many countries around the world , rural people are moving to cities ,so the population in the country side is decreasing Do you think it is a positive or a negative development
Recently, plenty of residents from different nations around the globe who are living in rural areas tend to immigrate to metropolitan regions leading to a decrease in state in the countryside. This writer believes that this is a negative development due to bringing fewer job opportunities for juniors and reduce in agricultural production.
7.5
band
Some believe that celebrities' support of international aid organizations draws attention to problems, while others think that celebrities make problems less important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Some people argue that famous people are able to bring additional support by attracting the public attention to charity activities, while others consider that stars' involvement devalues the meaning of the event. I believe that although some celebrities do have not the best morals and reputation, the wide spreading of information about humanitarian aid is much more important for raising funds and attracting worldwide support.

Investment in local amenities such as leisure centers is the best way for the government to foster a good community spirit. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

In many families nowadays, both parents work and pay people to look after their children. Some people believe this is not good for families. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

For centuries, important parts of education have remained, such as reading, writing and maths. With the advent of computers, some people think that computer skills be made us a fourth skill to be added to the list. To what extent do you agree?

Many people around the world use social media everyday to keep in touch with other people and get news events. Do you think the advantanges outweigh the disadvamtages?

In many countries around the world , rural people are moving to cities ,so the population in the country side is decreasing Do you think it is a positive or a negative development

Some believe that celebrities' support of international aid organizations draws attention to problems, while others think that celebrities make problems less important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.