There are severe social consequences to housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In today's world, multifarious

people

have suffered from a scarcity of housing due to lots of problems that have been encountered. Some

people

believed that the administration must take some serious steps to mitigate

this

issue

such

as by providing loans to those who do not have a place for dwelling as well as by developing a rural area. I strongly agree with

this

statement and will elaborate on my views on

this

in the following paragraphs. To commence with, there are a plethora of job opportunities in the urban area for youngsters.

This

is the reason why the young

people

move from the village to the city.

For instance

, a recent survey revealed that 95 % of teenagers migrate to town because of the lack of employment in the countryside area.

Therefore

, the government should go the extra mile and provide those necessary facilities which are essential in the rural areas

such

as Colleges, Schools, Industries, Companies, Subway and so on. In

this

way, the crowd in the towns decreases and more spaces are left for dwelling.

Furthermore

, the building of houses has been reduced due to the increase in the prices of construction materials like concrete and specific sand used for it.

Thus

, the only authorities can cope with

this

obstacle by not only providing the unused land to that community who do not have shelter for

living

Add an article

a living

show examples

but

also

aid

Wrong verb form

aiding

show examples

people

by taking loans from the banks for the folk who did not have houses. To conclude, it can be seen that providing houses for every human being is one of the duties and responsibilities that the government should into consideration.

However

,

this

action needs all parts of the community is help

such

as private and public affairs to overcome it.