The dilemma that has been raised controversy through the centuries is what the money from the public budget should be spent on. A plethora of people, as well as I, tend to believe that essay I will
this
is a system of railroad lines that are worthwhile - while other members of society, Linking Words
on the other hand
, opt for roads. In Linking Words
this
,Linking Words
Add an article
an
the
further
explore Linking Words
this
highly interesting and thought-provoking issue.
Personally, I totally agree that authorities had better invest funds in railways rather than inroads. The primer reason is that cars cause contamination and, as a sequence, they not only spoil the ecosystemLinking Words
,
but Remove the comma
apply
also
in turn commence to impact the health of a population. Linking Words
Moreover
, in certain ,places the development of highways or other ways for vehicles does not make sense at all, as climate conditions are too severe for it. Linking Words
For example
, in Kamchatka or in another place full of mountain chains it just goes in vain.
The secondary reason is that the better and the wider array of roads are built in a particular country, the more individuals are probably using it. Due to the fact that Linking Words
this
type of transport is much safer, Linking Words
thus
, the fewer acсidents will occur. Linking Words
For instance
, in Russia approximately with only one train per month, albeit even not always, happens something unpleasant, compared to statistics of crashes among automobiles.
In conclusion, I would like to stress that if were two options to contribute to the government revenue: either rail or roadways - I would choose the Linking Words
first
one in order to boost both safeness and the environmental situation of the nation.Linking Words
karpovai024