It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people opine that
extinction
is a part of nature and preventing it from happening is futile. I partly disagree with
this
notion because there is a distinction between natural and human-induced
extinction
, and the latter may prove to be catastrophic to both humans and
animals
. On the one hand, it is neither useful nor financially possible to try to save every
species
on planet Earth. The natural environments and habitats have been changing for billions of years. Throughout
this
timeframe, animal
species
have adapted to the changes or evolved into new
species
in order to survive. While one day it may be technologically feasible to preserve all
animals
in artificial environments, it will surely cost a prohibitive amount of tax money for research and implementation.
Furthermore
, the objective of
such
projects is questionable as they only provide insights that only the elite scientists have the ability to grasp, and it does not address what I believe is the main cause of mass
extinction
: human activities.
On the other hand
, I argue that we must be conscious that a wave of human-influenced mass
extinction
can
also
negatively affect our survival and that we have to make efforts to save the important
animals
. Human activities have led to global climate change, deforestation, severe pollution, and overhunting that
consequently
put a plethora of
animals
on the brink of
extinction
, including the keystone
species
.
This
could inflict irreparable damage to our societies in its wake. Take sharks that prey on seals
for
Add the comma(s)
,for
show examples
example, their population has been on the decline, owing to overfishing. With the limited presence of their predators, the seal population has multiplied and they have started to consume other fish that humans use as food at an unprecedented rate. If rules and
regulation
Fix the agreement mistake
regulations
show examples
or education are not established to stop fishermen from driving sharks out of existence, we could expect a shortage of fish as a protein source in the near future. In conclusion, I think that it is prudent for our society to ensure the survival of particular
species
.
However
,
this
must be done strategically as not to waste
further
resources.
Submitted by sophiecherry72 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • extinction
  • evolution
  • biodiversity
  • ecosystem
  • habitat destruction
  • climate change
  • conservation
  • irreversible
  • ecological balance
  • species preservation
  • environmental ethics
  • sustainability
  • endangered species
  • natural selection
  • ecosystem services
  • wildlife protection
  • moral obligation
  • human intervention
What to do next:
Look at other essays: