Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitat. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care.To what extent do you agree?

Nowadays,
people
have been donating much of their money to nonprofit associations to save
animals
and their abode. Of course, opinions on the subject may be diverging,
thus
while some believe that using money to help solve primary social problems is noble, others do not totally agree. Personally, I believe that it would be better for
people
to be able to balance the two matters.
First
, when analyzing the impact of animal exploitation on a country’s economy, we immediately get to know that it represents one of the main sources of income throughout the world. Of course,
such
exploitation should be done respecting laws and norms, which means protecting
animals
and their habitat. Because of
this
, many nations have been improving their fishing techniques to provide for a higher seafood quality,
consequently
characterized by higher prices. Japan represents the perfect example, being its seafood prices
some
Add a missing verb
are some
show examples
of the highest in the world market, because of their modern techniques and detailed policies in regenerative resources.
On the other hand
, the issue of animal exploitation is to be analyzed together with that of human health. In biosciences, humans and
animals
are closely related factors in the food chain and any change
apported
Correct your spelling
appointed
to one of them will affect the other. It has been proven that improving health care is not possible if
animals
and their habitat are not correctly protected
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
because
people
cannot survive in an unbalanced environment. To prove
this
, a recent FAO study, reported that over three billion
people
in the world
have
Add the particle
tohave
show examples
need fish’s protein to survive. In conclusion, I believe that
instead
of concentrating on government spending, new income opportunities should be provided. Only once
people
will be able to earn their money, they will decide to take part in the process of life and health improvement.
Submitted by allie.seder on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • biodiversity
  • ecosystem services
  • ethical imperative
  • conservation
  • natural habitats
  • interconnectedness
  • preclude
  • false dichotomy
  • holistic approaches
  • sustainable development
  • environmental stewardship
  • social welfare
  • poverty alleviation
  • eco-tourism
What to do next:
Look at other essays: