It is argued that letting children pursue
in foreign countries can contribute enormously to a nation’s development.
I acknowledge the tremendous merits of studying overseas to a
, I think it
has certain adverse effects,
On the one hand, global integration and maximization of students’ potentials, which are the effects of foreign
, is of paramount importance to the origin
. Evidently, studying abroad gives students a golden opportunity to come into contact with new cultures and lifestyles.
interaction allows them to develop a deeper understanding of other countries, which is particularly valuable in the context of globalization and can be utilized to contribute to the growth of their homeland.
, an economic student who possesses knowledge about the spending habits of foreign citizens can help to improve the quality of exports to that nation. More importantly, students who study overseas are likely to be more thoroughly educated.
is because foreign
as the US, the UK or Finland often offer well-designed syllabuses with optimal facilities which help to enhance students’ strengths and expertise.
, they will be of great assistance when they finish their courses and return to their home
On the other hand
, the trend of studying overseas can
hurt the origin
due to a phenomenon called brain drain. The fact is that the destinations of international students are often highly developed countries, which means that their standards of living there are likely to be significantly higher compared to the conditions at home.
creates a sense of temptation for them to stay
of returning and making contributions to their nation. The resultant refusal to come back can damage the origin
greatly due to the loss of talents and if
a tendency continues to a greater extent, the source of high-quality labour in developing states may eventually exhaust, hindering
In conclusion, while foreign
can foster global integration and hone talents for a
, it can
result in a shortage of human assets which hamper national development.