Some people think human behaviors can be limited by laws, others think laws have little effect. What is your opinion?

People have always wondered about the possibility of forming a person's character just by enacting some strict rules and regulations. Others,

however

, argue that

such

rigid laws cannot deter criminals from committing crimes. I personally agree with the latter

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and think that other measures must be taken abreast of the former group.

Firstly

, the human mind rejects any limitations imposed on its freedom and

thus

denies any confinement.

Additionally

, if one is not properly educated on how to be a prosperous member of society, there would be no guarantee he would behave well and inhibits any wrongdoings.

For example

, drivers are being fined by the police more and more on a regular basis, which has no tangible effect on reducing the rate of road accidents.

Therefore

, a robber who is sentenced to jail for a long period suffers mentally, leading to his rehabilitation.

On the other hand

, a vast majority of individuals state that internalizing the culture of obedience is what can lead to a law-abiding society.

In other words

, a child who knows the consequences of his actions would never turn to a felony and is scared of the death penalty or life imprisonment.

Thus

, schools play an indispensable role in bringing up our children according to the most practical and functional standards of morality.

For instance

, a Canadian education centre has conducted an educational program for primary school students to hear about the negative drawbacks of murder from a murderer. To conclude, even though the presence and importance of some laws can act as a deterrent in modern society, the benefits of responsible parents to teach the best human behaviours to children is not negligible.

Lastly

, obeying the rules can avoid chaos in a community.