It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South Pole. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Softening the approaches of commuting to distance arenas is considered as the most important radix behind attracting individuals to these sites.Whereas some positive footprints are experienced regarding
this
opportunity,unfortunately,alternatively,its dire consequences are not deniable,while in my opinion, they are under the shadow of benefits. as a worth mentioning aspect,the lucrative sources of revenue that have been bestowed to the aboriginals have provided the opportunity not only to enhance the standards of their life but
also
to facilitate the infrastructures to rescue nature.
For instance
, in some cases, the opportunity of investigating and studying various types of the species have been grasped to rescue as some of them used to be encountered by the threat of extinction.
Furthermore
, the side effects of folks activity,
such
as greenhouse gases emissions,are more tangible in these areas,as a vivid case the impression of global warming on the polar ice-caped mountains,which prompted the governments to allocate budgets to tackling
this
issue.
On the other hand
,the balance of the natural sites has been eradicated by the manipulating that man-kind has done in these vicinities,either visitors or the indigenous have contributed to erect some amenities for both targets abusing the wildlife in order to financial ambitions or
similarly
for absorbing more banknotes from encouraging the member of societies to travel to these areas.The contamination of humans' existence is
also
the other dire consequence,which would appear by establishing new industries for exploiting the natural resources,
hence
not only the reservoir of the earth would vanish after a while but
also
as a chain will ignite the other drawbacks by polluting the soil and the air. To wrap up,whereas some devastating activities have taken place,by putting rigorous rules not only the majority of the issues that used to be considered as downsides would shrink drastically but
also
the public knowledge enhance owing to the new pieces of information that are found there.
Submitted by drpnima on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: