The advocates of international aid believe that countries have a moral obligation to help each other, while the opponents consider it unnecessary, because money is misspent by the governments that receive it.

Currently, international aid has never failed to provoke debates. While some claim that nations have a moral obligation to support each other, the opposite makes a statement that

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

worldwide assistance is unnecessary due to the misspending of the receiver. While the latter is valid to some certain extent, I consider myself

as

Change preposition

apply

show examples

a proponent of the former. Without a shadow of

doubt

Add an article

a doubt

show examples

,

countries

should support each other because of its tremendous benefits. Because some

countries

don’t have the financial ability to handle their own problems ranging from education, economy… and especially healthcare. So that they need the advocate from developed and wealthy

countries

to rely on. If prosperous

countries

don’t lend them

hand

Add an article

a hand

show examples

when the underdeveloped

countries

are in a critical condition, they can not come out of

this

crisis situation.

For example

, in

covid-19

Add an article

a covid-19

the covid-19

show examples

pandemic, Vietnam, the developing

countries

whose medical amenities are too dilapidated and have insufficient vaccine resources to fight

this

epidemic. America and Britain have provided Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines for Vietnam to reduce the number of casualties in

this

pandemic. Due to these redeeming features that can be brought, it is necessary for

countries

to promote mutual assistance to develop together.

Although

the benefits of international support are widely acknowledged, some people argue that it is not necessary since the recipient

countries

may misspend

this

money.

However

,

this

is ungrounded and unlikely to happen. The

countries

will have joint commitments and how the subsidy is used will be controlled by the governments of both

countries

so that the money can improve the current problem of that country.

Therefore

, there is no reason why the receiver country could misuse the money. In conclusion, it is undeniable that the government should help each other to increase the friendship and simultaneously flourish the distinct nations in the world.