Holding International games such as The Olympic Games is an exciting event. Some people think that it has positive effects while other argue that it is a waste of money. Discuss both sides of view and give your own opinion.

Major international events are fascinating. The city host usually has their once in a lifetime experience as being the world’s spotlight.

On the other hand

, several people tend to believe

this

leads to unreasonable financial expenditure. As far as I

concerned

Add a missing verb

am concerned

show examples

,

although

International

games

are overpriced, they are satisfactory to a long-term city’s legacy.

This

essay will present a discussion of both sides of view.

Firstly

, when a country wins the bid to host an Olympic

Games

is the chance of being broadcasting worldwide and becoming the spotlight. Media coverage before and during the

games

is undeniable and

this

fact leads to an exposure that will bring more visitors.

For example

, Rio 2016 Olympic and Paralympic

games

held in Brazil had increased 40% tourist’s visits through 2 years after the

Games

.

Therefore

, hosting international events can be remarkable to economic growth through the tourism industry.

However

, hosting the Olympic

Games

can be catastrophic if not well planned. It is crucial to plan a long term and map out all the sports venues on how they can be used after the

games

,

otherwise

, several venues can become white-elephants stadiums. To illustrate

this

, the Athena’s Olympics

Games

in 2004 was an outstanding event, notwithstanding, it was not well organized and most of the arenas nowadays are destroyed due to time.

Thus

, a plethora of money can be spent when a country receives the bid of a

Games

and the return of investment can be pointless if not well-planned. To conclude, from the arguments presented above, it is inconceivable to believe that financial expenditure does not exist.

Nevertheless

, there is positive effects as well as drawbacks when hosting any mega event.