Some governments provide financial assistance for retired, unemployed and disabled citizens. In other countries, families provide support for these people. Discuss both systems and give your opinion about which one you think is better.

Nowadays,

countries

have different ways of dealing with retired, unemployed and disabled citizens in terms of financial constraints. While others get full assistance from the

government

, some

people

from other

countries

do not and

instead

, get their

families

to help with

this

matter. There are pros and cons on both sides topics but the benefits of getting full financial assistance from the

government

seem more appealing to society.

First

world

countries

can afford to help with the finances of those

people

who cannot work anymore due to retirement, unemployment and disability.

This

is actually a benefit that citizens of these

countries

can enjoy and it really aids towards a better and more fulfilling life. It can support the overall well-being of a person if there is still a source of financial aid despite the loss of income.

This

fund is taken usually from the tax of the

people

; the higher the pay, the bigger the tax will be, thereby promoting equality among the nation. The only downside would be that the tax is so high that some

people

do not agree with it,

therefore

can cause some retaliation. On the other note, other

countries

,

such

as

third

world

countries

, cannot afford to have

this

financial aid system for the no income group.

This

is usually because of the unstable and unrefined

government

that these

countries

have. Due to

this

,

families

need to get from their own pockets just to support these individuals. Those who are wealthy get to assist with

this

matter with no problem at all but the drawback is that poor

families

cannot really make ends meet when it comes to

this

matter. The result is that poor

families

become more financially unstable eventually leading to poor economic growth in society. In summary, both views have positive and negative outputs for the citizens but if I were to choose which one is a better system, I would choose the one with full monetary assistance for the unemployed, retired and disabled

people

from the

government

. I do believe that

though

Correct your spelling

through

show examples

its drawback, which is the high-income taxes from the general population, would be a threat, its positive outcome outweighs it and would benefit the

people

and the country as a whole.