It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is now apparent that cutting-edge technology and scientific advances have opened up opportunities for tourists and scientists to set foot to natural far-off destinations. While
this
trend has some benefits, I believe that the drawbacks overshadow them.
On the one hand, travelling to remote natural environments has its own merits. For the travellers, a whole new world may engender the novel feeling of amusement. Some commonplace attractions Linking Words
such
as museums, exhibitions or theatres are seemingly familiar that every country has, as opposed to the South Pole or Amazon forests, which are portrayed as outstanding and breathtaking but only a handful of people have chances to experience. For Linking Words
this
reason, coming to these destinations , tourists would enrich more knowledge about natural habitats and witness the picturesque scenes in real life. Linking Words
Furthermore
, for scientists and experts, Linking Words
this
is a great opportunity to investigate natural life. Linking Words
For instance
, polar bears might be taken to the laboratory to be explored about genes and organisms.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, going to isolated natural regions could put humans and animal species at risk. Linking Words
Firstly
, travellers may be contracted with health problems, Linking Words
such
as thermal shock if they are not well-prepared with special clothes or equipment since the weather is severe there. Linking Words
In addition
, they could under the threat of being attacked by wild animals. Take, Amazon as an example, Linking Words
this
is the home of various kinds of animals with different levels of triggering pain. Linking Words
Secondly
, the propensity of visiting remote arrivals might cause environmental hazards as many low-aware tourists would litter rubbish or indiscriminately feed animals;resulting in the disturbance of biological lifestyle.
In conclusion, remote natural destinations are not suitable for developing mass tourism and governmental bodies should curb the number of travellers going to these placesLinking Words
Submitted by ngoctranminh2411 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.