Some experts say for road safety cyclists should pass a test before being allowed on public roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There have been recent calls for mandatory tests for

cyclists

before they are permitted on public motorways. In my opinion, though

this

proposal must be managed properly it is advisable. Detractors argue

this

reform is essentially a complex method of fixing a problem that does not exist. Riding a bike is a fairly simple skill that most people learn as children. It is unclear at what age

such

a test and license should be logistically required. The extra paperwork and bureaucracy would make it a negative for both

cyclists

and those charged with enforcing

this

law. If passed, there is

also

the strong likelihood that it would be tokenistic.

Cyclists

might be able to pass a basic written test and demonstrate the ability to ride a bike but that would not ensure they will actually be safe riders.

However

, in my opinion, there exists a need since most

cyclists

are not particularly cognizant of the hierarchy of vehicles. In most cities,

cyclists

are considered a menace or an annoyance and increase the odds of accidents. Many

cyclists

feel they are essentially the same as cars and weave into traffic where cars and motorbikes travelling at faster speeds rightly belong. If there was better education and a law that required

cyclists

to learn unwritten rules of etiquette,

this

would greatly enhance road conditions for motorists and pedestrians.

For instance

, in certain European nations,

cyclists

must apply for licenses and

this

has created a culture where bicycles fit into the flow of traffic more seamlessly. In conclusion,

although

there are significant practical hurdles, I believe requiring

cyclists

to apply for licenses addresses a key public road issue. Governments should

therefore

enact

this

or similar regulation.